©2018  Res Publica  |  Excalibur   
Res Publica, P.O. Box 142, Upland IN 46989  |  Contact Us

The opinions expressed on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of other Taylor University faculty, staff, or students.

Thoughts on Radical Feminism

March 28, 2018

As a woman who has been part of the TU community for nearly a quarter of a century, I am dismayed to see the continuing rise of feminist thought at Taylor. I certainly affirm the equal value of women and men, both being made in the image of God. But I would caution those who believe that feminism is simply a call to equality to think again.

 

Here are a few of my objections to the radical feminist movement. First, there is the undeniable link to the pro-choice movement. No one can deny the deep historical and current connection between feminism and abortion. A major tenet of radical feminism is the right to kill one’s child in the womb. Not only does abortion take an innocent unborn life—half of which are females who will never have the chance to worry about equality—but abortion also destroys the lives of the women who exercise their legal right to choose as well as those women who are employed in the abortion industry. Abortion has been associated with a variety of mental and physical health issues that plague those who make that choice. This life-destroying choice is guarded viciously by feminists in countless ways, including the national Women’s March’s refusal to include pro-life groups in their demonstrations.

 

Second, radical feminists devalue traditional female roles in the home. Certainly, women who need or desire to work should be free to do so. But the feminist movement places such a heavy emphasis on closing the so-called “wage-gap” and women advancing in their careers as a way of proving their equality, that many women are left to believe that by not pursuing a career they are less valued by their peers. By choosing to stay at home or pursuing roles requiring fewer hours and more flexibility for their families, women are led to believe they are contributing less to society. Since when did caring for your family become less important than making more money? What if I find more value in the investment of raising and educating my children than in a paycheck? Does that make me a less valuable contributor to society or less intellectually worthy of praise? Defining one’s success by the size of one’s wallet has often been a temptation faced by men. Neglect of family and distorted priorities have often been the result of giving into that temptation. In order to be considered of equal value by feminists, do we women have to define our success in terms of dollars and cents?

 

Thirdly, radical feminists’ promotion of high risk sexual practices and attitudes place women in great danger. To me, this is one of the strangest paradoxes of our time. We are told ad nauseum that women are to be valued for their brains and not their boobs. Yet organizations like Planned Parenthood encourage women, even girls, to “explore” sexual practices which put them at great risk of abuse, disease and psychological damage. The normalization of pornography endangers women both through its objectification of their bodies and the sex trafficking trade that feeds it. And don’t get me started on the media speaking out of both sides of their mouth, as they claim to celebrate inner beauty all the while they set literally physically impossible standards of beauty.


Throughout history women have not always been treated with the respect they deserve or valued as they ought to be. However, I emphatically reject radical feminism as the answer. The only thing that will bring equality for all, including women, is the Gospel—the good news of Christ which affirms the value of everyone, as we play out different but vital roles while attempting to redeem God’s creation for His glory and the benefit of all.

Please reload

Recent Posts

October 25, 2019

December 10, 2018

Please reload

Res Publica Board

Gary Ross
  TU Men’s Soccer Head Coach

Richard Smith
  TU Professor of Biblical Studies

James Spiegel
  TU Professor of Philosophy & Religion

Benjamin Wehling
  Project Manager

Contributing Writers

Stacey Carter 
  Elementary Teacher

Zack Carter
  Assistant Professor of Communication

Stephen Hoffmann

  TU Professor Emeritus of Political Science

Ed Meadors

  TU Professor of Biblical Studies

Hadley Mitchell

  TU Professor of Economics

Michael Smith

  TU Adjunct Professor of Philosophy & Humanities (retired)

Amy Spiegel 
  Homemaker and Author

Drew Swing 
  TU Alumnus, Philosophy/Pre-med

Colleen Warren
  TU Professor of English

Stephen Weick

  TU Alumnus

  Would you like to offer a critical response to this or some other Res Publica article?  

Submit your 300-1000 word article to ContactResPublica@gmail.com.  All submissions will be seriously considered, but not all will be published.  Preference will be given to those articles which are clear, organized, well-focused, and fairly argued (which, minimally, means that no ad hominems, false dichotomies, appeals to emotion, straw-man arguments, or other logical fallacies are committed).